Context
Implementation testing is an important step in the Sitecore Content Hub implementation process. It ensures that the platform's configurations, features, and integrations work as intended before progressing further within the project phases. Effective testing minimizes risk and leads to improved user and customer satisfaction.
Execution
Implementation testing in Sitecore Content Hub focuses on targeted validation of individual system components, including integrations, asset and content workflows, and migrations. It involves systematic checks by the implementation team before broader user involvement. The testing outlined in this chapter should occur prior to the activities suggested within the Quality Assurance portion of the project (for example, User Acceptance Testing (UAT)).
We recommend that a documented test plan is created prior to performing formal implementation testing. The test plan ideally should include specific cases/steps/scenarios and their intended outcomes.
Suggested Testing Areas
Defining testing areas is essential for ensuring a structured, efficient, and reliable validation process—while also ensuring the end-to-end journey has been thoroughly tested. The following is a highlight of these applications:
Application | Checklist |
---|---|
Overall Configuration Validation Ensure domain model and custom page configurations align to established requirements. |
|
Role-Based Permissions Testing Validate user access levels to ensure appropriate permissions. |
|
Workflow Testing Confirm workflows align with user processes and operate as expected. |
|
Content Migration Validation Ensure data migration accuracy and completeness. |
|
Integration Testing Verify correct communication between Sitecore Content Hub and external systems. |
|
Performance Testing Assess system scalability and responsiveness under expected loads. |
|
Insights
Testing is a critical phase of Sitecore Content Hub implementation, ensuring that all functionalities work as expected and meet business requirements. A structured testing approach helps identify defects early, improving overall system stability and user experience.
Testing should cover various user roles, including Super Users, Content Editors, and Administrators, ensuring that all aspects of the platform—from asset management to search and user permissions—function correctly.
Key Testing Areas
This following outlines key testing activities, a structured test plan, and a sample testing template to facilitate consistent validation of the implementation.
Area | Activities |
---|---|
Asset Lifecycle Management |
|
Metadata Management |
|
Search & Filtering |
|
User Permissions & Security |
|
Integrations & Performance |
|
Sample Test Plan
Testing plans can take various shapes, the below is a structure to start with but customize based on your process and requirements. For each test make sure you track Pass/Fail, Tester, Test Date and place for Notes to capture feedback.
Test ID | Action | Page/Area | Expected Result |
---|---|---|---|
TST-001 | Upload an asset via UI | Create | Asset is uploaded successfully and appears in Content Hub |
TST-002 | Edit asset metadata in create area | Create | Metadata changes are saved successfully |
TST-003 | Submit an asset for approval (required fields missing) | Create | System prevents submission and displays validation errors |
TST-004 | Approve an asset via details page | Review | Asset is moved to the approved state and available for download |
TST-005 | Find an asset via advanced search | Assets (Search) | Asset is returned in search results |
TST-006 | Download a rendition | Asset Details | Correct file rendition is downloaded |
TST-007 | Share an asset via public link | Asset Details | Public link is generated and accessible |
TST-008 | Add an annotation to an asset | Asset Details | Annotation appears on the asset |